Here's the weight breakdown. Looks like the poncho system wins on weight. The guy lines couldn't possibly make up for the weight of the other options. It is, however, less luxurious in the rain. Fortunately the PCT doesn't experience a lot of rain. I suppose I could toss the 8x10 tarp into my gear for Washington where it's likely to be the rainiest. Having some extra space when you're hunkered down against the rain would be nice.
None of these includes seam sealing weight.
Option 1 | |
---|---|
The One tent | 16 oz |
Houdini windshirt (not waterproof) | 4 oz |
umbrella | 10 oz |
+A16 Bug Net as an extra | 6 oz |
Total: | 36 oz |
Option 2 | |
8x10 tarp | 14 oz |
guy lines | ? |
A16 Bug Net | 6 oz |
Houdini windshirt (not waterproof) | 4 oz |
umbrella | 10 oz |
Total: | 34 oz + guy lines |
Option 3 | |
Poncho tarp | 10 oz |
guy lines | ? |
A16 Bug Net | 6 oz |
Houdini Windshirt (not waterproof) | 4 oz |
Equinox bivy sack | 6.5 oz |
Total: | 26.5 oz + guy lines |
It pleases me the poncho system is the lightest. A goal I have for this year's hike is to be closer to the natural world, to sleep more outdoors. Another goal is to lessen my pack weight. The poncho system does both!
Here's another way to look at this:
Generous shelter in rain | Generous shelter against mosquitos | Sun protection | Option to sleep outside | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Option 1: The tent option, 36 oz | x | x | x | x |
Option 2: The tarp option, 34 oz | xx | x | x | |
Option 3: The poncho option, 26.5 oz | x |
So the question is, with a half pound to 3/4 pound advantage in weight over the tent system, is the relative deprivation of the poncho worth it? Will its advantages make up for the disadvantages?
Since I did not outline the advantages of the poncho, here they are. These are advantages the poncho system has that the others do not:
- Campsite selection requires less space
- Half a pound or more less weight
- Quicker to put up and take down
- Closest to nature
- Ultralight chic
No comments:
Post a Comment